Tighter Scrutiny Of Obama-Rezko Financial Ties
The online editions of both Chicago papers are leading today with stories about Obama-Rezko. The Sun-Times story can be read here and the Tribune story can be read here.
Obama's response to the revelation that his campaign benefited from more Rezko money than initially believed? It's difficult to keep track of all political contributions. Obama even acknowledged that more Rezko money given to him may yet be discovered in the future.
From the Sun-Times article:
This is the breakdown Obama provided for Rezko's fund-raising:
• About $160,000 for Obama's 2004 U.S. Senate election. Obama has given that money to charity.
• From $50,000 to $60,000 for Obama's failed attempt to unseat U.S. Rep. Bobby Rush in 2000.
• Between $10,000 and $15,000 for Obama's first election, in 1996, to the Illinois Senate.
• "Somewhat less than that'' for Obama's re-elections to the Illinois Senate in 1998 and 2002.
It's certainly good news that the Chicago papers are finally digging into the Obama-Rezko connection with seriousness and depth. The criticism remains, however, over what took them so long to take this story seriously and put pressure on the Senator to answer some questions?









Reader Comments (1)
We are a crooked state replete with crooked politicians and that heritage, even without evidence, is enough to raise suspicions.
A few more facts from a Rezko relationship, and suddenly the VP running mate for McCain becomes critically important.
As long as it's not Romney as VP, it could be a big win for McCain.